Hello, everybody, and welcome once again to the Apple
Basket!
This week, we have knitting, books, and Roman history –
all very familiar to regular readers, no big surprises there.
I am posting on a Saturday, for once: tomorrow, I am
going to a baby blessing. My cousin’s daughter, Kajsa, was born in July, and as
they are Baptists, the baptism proper won’t happen until she is old enough to
choose it for herself. So for now, there will be a blessing.
Which means that Victor and I, and my parents, are
leaving here at 6 a.m. to drive to Copenhagen, meeting my sister along the way
so that we can all share a car for the majority of the trip. It’s going to be a
long day – but lovely, I’m sure.
The
Knitting
My Rondeur tee, renamed Charm, received a substantial
boost this week, after I finished all the girly pink things (not that I mind
pink once in a while).
I have a bit of reading to do, preparing for term, and
so stocking stitch in the round is a suitable occupation for my hands while
wading through paragraphs of Latin morphology and syntax accompanying bites of
text in the beginners’ compendium.
Anyway, the body of the thing is done, and having yarn
left over, I decided to give it sleeves. While it is made in cotton and thus
probably not for deep winter, the neckline is fairly high, which means I won’t
be wearing it on the hottest days of summer, either. And so, sleeves will make
it more useful. I’ve divided the remaining yarn in two, and then we’ll see how
much sleeve I get out of it.
The Chemistry Department at the University of Surrey
in the UK is doing a knitted-and-crocheted Perovskite crystalline structure
project. I’ve mentioned it before, and now I’ve finally gotten around to making
one of these little things. I have chosen, unsurprisingly, to knit a blue
octahedron rather than crochet a yellow ball. The project is open for
contributions until the end of August, so there is still time, if you want to
play :o)
Patterns are downloadable, from the website and via
Ravelry, for both figures.
Depending on your particular stitch and row gauge, you
may want to make the triangles for the octahedron in a slightly different way; ladynthread has a method for bottom-up equilateral triangles.
I went all the way and made two open-bottomed pyramids
instead of eight triangles – this way, you only need to sew up the pyramid
bases and not all of the sides.
So, here goes:
I used Kauni 8/2 solid, blue yarn left over from my
TARDIS, and 4 mm needles.
Cast on 56 sts (or however many you need to make four
sides of 7-8 cm each).
Divide sts onto 4 dpns and join to work in the round.
Knit 2 rounds.
On every 3rd round, k3tog in the middle of
each dpn: these will be the corners.
NOTE:
k3tog: slip 2 sts knit-wise, k1, pass slipped sts over. This makes a nicely defined ridge.
When 2 sts remain on each dpn, ssk impr 4 times (insert RH needle into first st knitwise,
into second st tbl, and knit both together as one).
Break yarn, pull thread through remaining 4 sts.
Make one more.
Block.
Cut and tack in card triangles (I used a Weetabix box).
Sew base edges together to form octahedron.
Stuff.
Voila! A quick little project, just for fun.
As I’ve mentioned before, I am going to need work
clothes, i.e. neat cardigans and jumpers – we all have our definitions, don’t
we?
So, I am setting out to make an adult version of the
Laura cardigan, in black cotton to begin with. There is nothing, really, to
show off just yet; I cast on for the neckline and realised it was going to be
too wide, and then I was distracted by the octahedron that needed some
reworking to become properly equilateral.
The
Books
Most of my reading this week is about Rome. I know,
didn’t see that one coming, did you? :o)
I read the rest of the Philippic Speeches of Cicero,
bringing events through the spring of 43 BCE to the point where words were not
enough anymore, and civil war was a reality. Again.
Among the invectives against Marcus Antonius and his
brothers – Cicero calls Marcus ‘Spartacus’ (yes, the gladiator leader of the
slave rebellion in 73 – 71 BCE), refers to Lucius as a myrmillon, another type of gladiator, and repeatedly accuses Gaius
of extortion, greed and the like – is evidence that he well knew that his line
of politics could get him killed.
Roman politics in general were violent: a basic
principle was presence and immediacy, and personal participation was crucial.
Proposals were made in speeches in front of the Senate, with the Curia doors
open to the outside so that people could hear what was going on. Sometimes one
speech was made to the Senate and then another one to the People. Voting was
done by physically moving to one side of the hall; the people lined up outside and
voted, often immediately, on pressing matters. At times, fights and mini-riots
broke out in the crowds; magistrates were shoved and beaten and pelted with
stones, physically prevented from protesting or from speaking.
Going up against powerful and violent adversaries was,
of course, dangerous, and so, playing an active part in the upper echelons of
political society always held the risk of death or exile. Cicero knew this
well: he was exiled temporarily in 58, and this situation was even more
critical. Indeed, at this point in time, soon after the murder of Caesar,
everyone was freshly aware of how lethal politics could be. Some preferred to
seek neutral ground and stay out of the fray, but most of the patricians
adhered to their noble ancestry and the inherited sense of honour and courage
in the face of danger: they would rather face an honourable death than
ignominious compromise.
Roman religion was, as Roman life in general, divided
into the private and the public spheres: every official act, be it a meeting of
the Senate, a People’s Assembly, an election, a declaration of war, a battle –
all were preceded by the taking of auspices. Signs and omens were observed or
actively sought and then interpreted; if Jupiter thundered in the skies, there
could not be an assembly, because that was regarded as a sign of divine displeasure.
Thus, auspices were an integral part of politics, and priests were elected from
the same body of men as magistrates and military leaders.
Privately, a Roman would sacrifice to his – or her –
Lares, household gods, visit various temples or shrines to barter with
whichever divinity might give them what they wanted. This was a practical
affair, usually described by the phrase do
ut des: ‘I give so that you will give’.
For more spiritual needs, one would turn to
philosophy, choosing one or a mix of the Greek schools. Stoicism, Cynicism,
Epicureanism – take your pick. The benefit of these (I know this is hugely
simplified and could easily fill a whole book – or several) was reconciliation
with the tumult of life and the prospect of death. Attempting to be less
dependent on worldly joys, wealth, comfort, and status, would have been helpful
in an uncertain milieu of political assassinations, external & civil wars
and proscription.
Cicero was an elected augur, a taker of auspices, as
well as a philosophical writer, having – in the years when he was practically
excluded from political life – read and translated a number of philosophical texts.
To render abstract Greek terms into Latin, he invented a number of words that
we know and use today, such as qualitas,
quantitas, essentia: quality, quantity, and essence.
Several times during the Philippic Speeches, Cicero
returns to the theme that his life may be – and it certainly was – in danger
because of his outspokenness against Marcus Antonius; he concludes that he has
lived long enough and accomplished enough to ensure his reputation, and thus,
he is ready to die.
Now, it is one thing to say this and quite another to
live it, so to speak. One could be forgiven for not completely trusting Cicero’s
own words, edited by himself after speaking and before publishing, about his
courage. But the accounts of Cicero’s death show him accepting his fate with
equanimity, calmly stretching his head out of the wagon when Marcus Antonius’
henchmen caught up with him.
Cicero was killed in December 43, 63 years old.
I am still reading The
First Man in Rome by Colleen McCullough, the first book in the series Masters of Rome. The ‘First Man’ of the
title is Gaius Marius who rose from being an outsider to being virtually the
leader of Rome – though not quite, as the phrase implies, a primus inter pares: first among equals.
Marius was a homo novus, a new man
not belonging to any of the old patrician or plebeian families of the city
proper. So many members of the old families refused to recognise him as a
worthy participant in the political game; and yet, he managed to be elected
consul no less than seven times. Under normal rules, this would only be
possible if a man lived to be over 100 years old: the minimum age was 42, and
ten years had to pass between two terms as consul.
But Marius was elected – in absentia, no less – in five consecutive years. The reason why he
was away from Rome, and why he was needed to stay in power, was the threat of a
huge Germanic invasion: about 800,000 people from three tribes had wandered
Europe for decades and wanted a nice, warm homeland instead of going back north
to where they came from. And Marius was the only military leader capable of organising
the repulsion and defeat of this river of bodies.
It’s not at all because the book is boring that it’s
taking me so long – it is a long book, nearly 900 pages, and I can’t read for
four hours a day, no matter what Stephen King says (which is: read four hours a
day and write four hours a day), at least not in a single book.
And besides, I need to re-read the beginners’ book I
am going to inflict on my students soon. This is a Danish set of two books, one
containing texts, glossary, and texts in Danish on the realia in the Latin
text; and a second book containing all of the grammar, morphology, syntax, and
exercises. It is called Vita Romana,
the Roman Life; and as it is out of print, we’ve had it scanned so that the
students can print it themselves. This, of course, leaves all of us with a
bunch of papers, but never mind. The students can write notes in the margins
without any worries, so that is all well and good.
The progression in the texts is logical and well-founded;
of course they will have a steep learning curve, but that never killed anybody,
so I am not worried. Yet.
On the listening front, I am continuing with two books
I have mentioned already: Age of
Innocence on CraftLit, read in the mellow tones of Brenda Dayne (of Cast On
podcast fame), and commented on by the ever erudite Heather Ordover.
Once in a while, I get to listen to a section of A Tale For the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki,
the story of the writer Ruth who finds a parcel washed ashore near her home in
British Columbia, that turns out to contain the diary of a 16-year old Japanese
girl, Nao. The narrative follows Ruth, as she reads the diary, interspersed
with her investigations of the facts presented in it – if they are facts – and her
use of this investigation to procrastinate the writing of her own memoir.
Ruth’s husband, Oliver, and the cat, Pest or Pesto,
play their own parts in the unfolding of the mystery.
The reason why I only intermittently listen to A Tale For the Time Being is that it is
one of the Audible swaps from my sister, and those I cannot move into my phone;
I have to listen from the laptop. So, I usually have several audio books running,
when I’m not catching up on podcasts: one on the laptop for sitting down and
knitting (or, when I’m home alone, I can listen via speakers), and one on the
phone for on-the-go listening. I have gathered a collection of them to listen
to, via the app, while driving to and from Aarhus, about an hour each way,
three times a week during the semester.
Right now, though, I am back with Shakespeare and the ChopBard
podcast, a bunch of episodes from 2010 dealing with The Tempest. And once again, I highly recommend this podcast to
anyone interested in Shakespeare.
The
Tempest is the play set on
the island with the magician and his daughter, the spirit servant and the
convict – and the shipwreck in the beginning, caused by, well, the tempest. I
have never read or seen this play before, so I have no idea how it unfolds, let
alone ends. The names Prospero, Miranda, Ariel and Caliban, though, have
filtered through into the pool of often heard but never properly known names of
Shakespeare characters, so it is good to finally get the back story to them.
Well, that’s it for now – I will be back next week with
more.
Until then: have a great week!